Difference between revisions of "Proposed criteria fac release"

From MC Chem Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
===Directions...from "Call"===
 
===Directions...from "Call"===
 
:- One-page proposal,
 
:- One-page proposal,
 +
::'''did we discuss changing this to 2-pages?'''
 
:- detailing the intended project
 
:- detailing the intended project
 
:- connections to present work.
 
:- connections to present work.

Revision as of 21:56, 15 December 2017

from "Call for Proposals"

Proposals for a one-course release to pursue scholarly activity.

  • Professional development
  • Scholarly research
  • Instructional development
  • New course development

should we add to the 2017-2018 "call" some criteria related to the service to the College?

Directions...from "Call"

- One-page proposal,
did we discuss changing this to 2-pages?
- detailing the intended project
- connections to present work.

Review Criteria (proposed/flexible)

  • is proposal 1-page? yes/no
1-page, not 2...follow directions!
  • is there 1 or more intended project listed? yes/no
multiple project seems too much for a single course release.
  • is there a current connection to the intended project? yes/no
  • are they requesting exemption from committee assignment? yes/no

Other

  • pre-tenure or post tenure?
Q: is it "correct" to give pre-tenure faculty release time...i am guessing that all pre-tenure faculty would WANT and even FEEL that they need more time, but do we really what pre-tenure faculty swapping teaching time for scholarly activities so early in their MC career?
  • Can this be done on an up and coming sabbatical?
  • Is the project timely...ie. need to be done during the proposed term?
  • Is a course release really going to allow this individual the time necessary to be successful with the proposed project?