Difference between revisions of "Pipette Verification"

From MC Chem Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(33 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Pipettes are commonly used in the biochemistry laboratory and in most cases, users make the assumption that these "instruments" are fully functional, but this is not always the case. Pipettes are dropped or mistreated and this can result in the pipette requiring recalibration by a trained professional. At the beginning of any research project, it is highly recommended (ie. DO IT) that you "verify" that the pipette is working properly. An extensive discussion of this can be found [[Media:Verification Procedure for Accuracy and Precision.pdf|here]]...but for research purposes, the verification procedure can be significantly less involved.
+
==Introduction==
 +
Pipettes are commonly used in the biochemistry laboratory to measure/dispense small volumes of liquids. In most cases, users make the assumption that these "instruments" are fully functional, but this is not always the case. Pipettes are dropped or mistreated and this can result in the pipette requiring recalibration by a trained professional. At the beginning of any research project, it is highly recommended (ie. DO IT) that you "verify" that the pipette is working properly. An extensive discussion of this can be found [[Media:Verification Procedure for Accuracy and Precision.pdf|here]]...but for research purposes, the verification procedure can be significantly less involved.
  
−
==Accuracy and Precision==
+
===Accuracy and Precision===
 
Before beginning the verification process, we must acknowledge the concepts of ''accuracy'' and ''precision''. Below are two figures showing the "target grouping" model describing accuracy and precision (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision Wiki] for more details):
 
Before beginning the verification process, we must acknowledge the concepts of ''accuracy'' and ''precision''. Below are two figures showing the "target grouping" model describing accuracy and precision (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision Wiki] for more details):
 
{|
 
{|
 
|
 
|
−
[[File:High precision Low accuracy.png|200px|thumb|left|low accuracy high precision]]
+
[[File:High precision Low accuracy.png|200px|thumb|center|low accuracy high precision]]
 
||
 
||
−
[[File:High accuracy Low precision.png|200px|thumb|left|high accuracy low precision]]
+
[[File:High accuracy Low precision.png|200px|thumb|center|high accuracy low precision]]
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 14: Line 15:
 
When one is '''highly accurate''' this means that when multiple measurements are averaged, you get an answer that is very close to the true value (demonstrated by the figure on the left).  
 
When one is '''highly accurate''' this means that when multiple measurements are averaged, you get an answer that is very close to the true value (demonstrated by the figure on the left).  
  
−
'''The goal is to be both precise and accurate, but accuracy is more important than precision (this can be debated).'''
+
'''The goal is to generate data that is both precise and accurate, but accuracy is more important than precision (this can be debated).'''
  
  
 
The figure below is a different model for thinking about accuracy and precision.
 
The figure below is a different model for thinking about accuracy and precision.
  
−
[[File:Accuracy and precision.png|200px|thumb|left| ]
+
{|
 +
|
 +
[[File:Accuracy and precision.png|400px|thumb|center|model 2]]
 +
|}
  
 +
===Error===
 +
When making a measurement, there are two types of errors that lead to low accuracy and low precision, 1) '''systematic error''' and 2) '''random error'''. Systematic errors result from either the person doing the measurement or the instrument used; systematic errors can be identified and corrected. Random errors are outside the control of the researcher and are dealt with by making multiple measurements and averaging the measured values. '''Training of personnel and the maintenance of instruments aim to minimize systematic errors and hence generate data that is as highly accurate and highly precise as possible.
  
  
  
−
that there are two sources of error:
+
==Recommended Pipette Verification Procedure using Gravimetric Analysis==
−
:1) Systematic
+
Pipettes are designed to operate over a specific range. We generally use Gilson pipettes with the following ranges:
−
:2) Instrumental
+
:P1000: 1000 uL --> 200 uL
 +
:P200: 200 uL --> 20 uL
 +
:P20: 20 ul --> 2 uL
 +
:P2: 2 uL --> 0.2 uL (not as common)
  
−
'''Recommended Verification Procedure using Gravimetric Test'''
+
A specific pipette can be verified by pipetting a set amount of water (density = 0.997 g/mL at 25 °C) into a container that is on an analytical balance. In most cases, the measuremeant is done at 3 different set amounts as indicated in the table below:
 +
 
 +
{| border=1
 +
|'''P1000'''||1000 uL||500 uL||200 uL|| ||'''P200'''||200 uL||100 uL||50 uL|| ||'''P20'''||20 uL||10 uL||5 uL
 +
|-
 +
|trial 1|| || || || ||trial 1|| || || || ||trial 1|| || ||
 +
|-
 +
|trial 2|| || || || ||trial 2|| || || || ||trial 2|| || ||
 +
|-
 +
|trial 3|| || ||  || ||trial 3|| || || || ||trial 3|| || ||
 +
|-
 +
|average|| || || || ||average|| || || || ||average || || ||
 +
|-
 +
|std dev|| || || || ||std dev|| || || || ||std dev || || ||
 +
|-
 +
|expected error||± 3 uL||± 1.5 uL||± 0.6 uL|| ||expected error||± 0.5 uL||± 0.25 uL||± 0.125 uL|| ||expected error||± 0.1 uL||± 0.05 uL||± 0.025 uL
 +
|}

Latest revision as of 12:41, 30 May 2017

Introduction

Pipettes are commonly used in the biochemistry laboratory to measure/dispense small volumes of liquids. In most cases, users make the assumption that these "instruments" are fully functional, but this is not always the case. Pipettes are dropped or mistreated and this can result in the pipette requiring recalibration by a trained professional. At the beginning of any research project, it is highly recommended (ie. DO IT) that you "verify" that the pipette is working properly. An extensive discussion of this can be found here...but for research purposes, the verification procedure can be significantly less involved.

Accuracy and Precision

Before beginning the verification process, we must acknowledge the concepts of accuracy and precision. Below are two figures showing the "target grouping" model describing accuracy and precision (see Wiki for more details):

low accuracy high precision
high accuracy low precision

This target grouping model makes it clear that there is a "correct" or "best answer" which is often referred to as the "true" value. In the two cases above, the true value is the center of the target. When one is highly precise this means that you can reproduce a measurement multiple times and get nearly the same answer each time, but it does not necessarily mean that the measured value is close to the true valve (demonstrated by the figure on the right). When one is highly accurate this means that when multiple measurements are averaged, you get an answer that is very close to the true value (demonstrated by the figure on the left).

The goal is to generate data that is both precise and accurate, but accuracy is more important than precision (this can be debated).


The figure below is a different model for thinking about accuracy and precision.

model 2

Error

When making a measurement, there are two types of errors that lead to low accuracy and low precision, 1) systematic error and 2) random error. Systematic errors result from either the person doing the measurement or the instrument used; systematic errors can be identified and corrected. Random errors are outside the control of the researcher and are dealt with by making multiple measurements and averaging the measured values. Training of personnel and the maintenance of instruments aim to minimize systematic errors and hence generate data that is as highly accurate and highly precise as possible.


Recommended Pipette Verification Procedure using Gravimetric Analysis

Pipettes are designed to operate over a specific range. We generally use Gilson pipettes with the following ranges:

P1000: 1000 uL --> 200 uL
P200: 200 uL --> 20 uL
P20: 20 ul --> 2 uL
P2: 2 uL --> 0.2 uL (not as common)

A specific pipette can be verified by pipetting a set amount of water (density = 0.997 g/mL at 25 °C) into a container that is on an analytical balance. In most cases, the measuremeant is done at 3 different set amounts as indicated in the table below:

P1000 1000 uL 500 uL 200 uL P200 200 uL 100 uL 50 uL P20 20 uL 10 uL 5 uL
trial 1 trial 1 trial 1
trial 2 trial 2 trial 2
trial 3 trial 3 trial 3
average average average
std dev std dev std dev
expected error ± 3 uL ± 1.5 uL ± 0.6 uL expected error ± 0.5 uL ± 0.25 uL ± 0.125 uL expected error ± 0.1 uL ± 0.05 uL ± 0.025 uL
Retrieved from "http://205.166.159.208/wiki/index.php?title=Pipette_Verification&oldid=5578"