Blackbody Radiation Mathematica - Revision history

Bes at 14:26, 17 January 2019

2019-01-17T14:26:57Z

Bes at 14:26, 17 January 2019

2019-01-17T14:26:27Z

Bes at 14:05, 17 January 2019

2019-01-17T14:05:51Z

Bes at 18:42, 18 January 2018

2018-01-18T18:42:00Z

Bes: Created page with "Mathematica is an excellent software package to visualize equations. In this activity, you will ultimately reproduce the Figure 1.2 from your textbook (Engle/Reed) showing the..."

2018-01-18T18:41:39Z

Created page with "Mathematica is an excellent software package to visualize equations. In this activity, you will ultimately reproduce the Figure 1.2 from your textbook (Engle/Reed) showing the..."

New page

Mathematica is an excellent software package to visualize equations. In this activity, you will ultimately reproduce the Figure 1.2 from your textbook (Engle/Reed) showing the variation in the frequency output from a blackbody radiator. But first...

1) Plot the frequency vs. spectral density when the blackbody is at 3000 K.

2) Now plot 2 functions (as in part 1) on the same graph for 3000 K and 4000 K.

3) Expand on this plot in part 2 to reproduce Figure 1.2 in your text.

4) Now use the "Manipulate" function in Mathematica to produce an interactive plot for temperature ranging from 3000 - 4000 K.

All of the above graphs are plots of frequency vs. spectral density...can we then do the same as above (1-4) for a function that uses wavelength as opposed to frequency? See the wiki page below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 17 January 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:

	5) All of the above graphs are plots of frequency vs. spectral density...can we then do the same as above (1-4) for a function that uses wavelength as opposed to frequency? See this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law		5) All of the above graphs are plots of frequency vs. spectral density...can we then do the same as above (1-4) for a function that uses wavelength as opposed to frequency? See this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law
−	(Note: the wiki page uses spectral radiance as opposed to spectral density; the difference appears to be only a constant).	+	:(Note: the wiki page uses spectral radiance as opposed to spectral density; the difference appears to be only a constant).

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 17 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[http://esr.monmsci.net/wiki/index.php/CHEM_322 ...back to Chem 322]
		+
	Mathematica is an excellent software package to visualize equations. In this activity, you will ultimately reproduce the Figure 1.2 from your textbook (Engle/Reed) showing the variation in the frequency output from a blackbody radiator. But first...		Mathematica is an excellent software package to visualize equations. In this activity, you will ultimately reproduce the Figure 1.2 from your textbook (Engle/Reed) showing the variation in the frequency output from a blackbody radiator. But first...

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ) Now plot 2 functions (as in part 1) on the same graph for 3000 K and 4000 K.
 ) Expand on this plot in part 2 to reproduce Figure 1.2 in your text.
@@ Line 9: / Line 10: @@
 ) Now use the "Manipulate" function in Mathematica to produce an interactive plot for temperature ranging from 3000 - 4000 K.
-All of the above graphs are plots of frequency vs. spectral density...can we then do the same as above (1-4) for a function that uses wavelength as opposed to frequency? See this wiki page:
+) All of the above graphs are plots of frequency vs. spectral density...can we then do the same as above (1-4) for a function that uses wavelength as opposed to frequency? See this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law
+(Note: the wiki page uses spectral radiance as opposed to spectral density; the difference appears to be only a constant).